<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chess Community &#187; Chess Mind</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chesscommunity.com/category/chess_mind/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chesscommunity.com</link>
	<description>Chess Blogs, News, Tournaments and Updates!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 19:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Tactics Two-Fer: Solution Time</title>
		<link>http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1205384543.shtml</link>
		<comments>http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1205384543.shtml#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 05:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Monokroussos</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Chess Mind]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:chessmind.powerblogs.com://445088cbe817e14d7c68e585faf2d8cc</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Tuesday I offered these positions to test your ability to calculate and/or analyze:...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[On Tuesday I offered these positions to test your ability to calculate and/or analyze:<br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.chesscommunity.com/wp-content/uploads/chessmind.powerblogs.com/files/najer_ftacnik_bundesliga2008.jpg"><br />
<b>Najer-Ftacnik, Bundesliga 2007/8</b><br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.chesscommunity.com/wp-content/uploads/chessmind.powerblogs.com/files/botvinnik_stoltz_1926_analysis.jpg"><br />
<b>Botvinnik-Stoltz, Leningrad-Stockholm 1926</b><br />
<br />
The first problem is a straightforward White-to-move-and-win position, while the second requires evaluating the following line, given by both Mikhail Botvinnik and Andy Soltis: <b>12.Bb1 f5 13.Nxe4 fxe4 14.Rxc7 exf3 15.Rxb7 Qg5 16.g3 Qg4 17.Kh1 Rf6 18.Rg1 Rh6 19.Qf1 Qh5 20.h4 Qxh4</b> and Black wins (12.Nxe4 was the move played in the game). It's always better if you can solve it yourself, but if you can't, won't, or have but want to confirm your answer, enlightenment is <a href="http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/files/3_13_2008_tactics.htm">just a click away</a>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1205384543.shtml/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Karpov Quote: A Follow-up</title>
		<link>http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1205382646.shtml</link>
		<comments>http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1205382646.shtml#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 04:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Monokroussos</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Chess Mind]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:chessmind.powerblogs.com://667145361159a25933fd795fb11e7e86</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this post, I presented the following Karpov quote, from his 1978 work My Best Games:...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1204526716.shtml">this post</a>, I presented the following Karpov quote, from his 1978 work <i>My Best Games</i>:</p>

<blockquote>
<p>I always want to be first. If I were not a chess player, I would want to be first in whatever I was doing. And even more in chess - otherwise it would be silly to play seriously. If you are not first, it means you have been defeated. And who wants to be a loser?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>There was an interesting discussion about this in the comments section, some of it focused on Karpov's last, somewhat harsh-sounding comment about being a "loser". That is part of what caught my eye in the first place, too, but yesterday I came across a second Karpov quotation, this time from a 1973 or 1974 article cited in Karpov's co-authored (with Aleksander Roshal) <i>Chess is My Life</i> (published in English in 1980; based on the content I'd say the original was written in 1978), page 122:</p>

<blockquote>
<p>I always want to be first. If I weren't a chess player, all the same I would aim to be first at something. Well, let's say, not first, but one of the best. And what about in chess? In chess--even more so. Otherwise it is stupid to play seriously. And besides, if you are not first, it means you have lost. And who enjoys losing?"</p>
</blockquote>

<p>These two quotes, though not their surrounding contexts in the two books, are almost identical. So this seems almost like a creed for Karpov, something like a motto or a purpose statement. The one obvious difference is the final statement in each case: the first quote sounds harsher and more sweeping: if you don't win, you're a "loser". The second quote doesn't describe the person, but only the event and its psychological effects.</p>

<p>Based on the strong similarities, I'm guessing that what we have here is a difference among translators, though any readers with access to Russian-language originals are welcomed, indeed invited, to say more. (For those who are curious, the translator of the "loser" passage was Hanon Russell of <a href="http://chesscafe.com/">Chess Cafe</a> fame, while "losing" was translated by Kenneth Neat.)</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1205382646.shtml/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who is A. Jocha? Here&#8217;s the answer&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1205380807.shtml</link>
		<comments>http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1205380807.shtml#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 04:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Monokroussos</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Chess Mind]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:chessmind.powerblogs.com://1d55dd97d61069fbccfbe3d4bfabaa3f</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hungarian GM Andras Adorjan! I offered a very subtle hint in the original post, concluding with "OK?", an allusion to his famous "Black is OK" slogan. Adorjan doesn't play much...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hungarian GM Andras Adorjan! I offered a very subtle hint in the <a href="http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1205302197.shtml">original post</a>, concluding with "OK?", an allusion to his famous "Black is OK" slogan. Adorjan doesn't play much nowadays, but he made it to the 1980 Candidates Matches and helped Peter Leko in his early development to the grandmaster level.<br />
<br />
Readers can find a long and very interesting interview with Adorjan <a href="http://www.chessville.com/Editorials/Interviews/20Questions/Adorjan.htm">here</a> (probably not for young kids).]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1205380807.shtml/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Reykjavik Chess Festival and Fischer Memorial, and the USCF</title>
		<link>http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1205304287.shtml</link>
		<comments>http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1205304287.shtml#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 06:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Monokroussos</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Chess Mind]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:chessmind.powerblogs.com://4525dd3211167177692413b2c1c159d2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To commemorate what would have been Bobby Fischer's 65th birthday, his adopted country of Iceland dedicated the Reykjavik Chess Festival to his memory and arranged a side event starring...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[To commemorate what would have been <a href="http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1205039895.shtml">Bobby Fischer's 65th birthday</a>, his adopted country of Iceland dedicated the <a href="http://www.skaksamband.is/index.php?option=content&amp;task=view&amp;id=5752&amp;Itemid=418">Reykjavik Chess Festival</a> to his memory and arranged a side event starring four of his contemporaries (Pal Benko, Vlastimil Hort, Lajos Portisch and Fridrik Olafsson, with Boris Spassky as the referee and William Lombardy as commentator) to boot. (Portisch and Hort shared first with 4/6, according to <a href="http://www.chesstoday.net">Chess Today</a>.) Kudos to Iceland!<br />
<br />
Not to be outdone, the United States Chess Federation dedicates 11 pages in the current issue of <i>Chess Life</i> to Fischer. Is that unbelievably awesome or what? Meanwhile, <a href="http://www.europe-echecs.com/">Europe Echecs</a>, a French-language chess magazine, has dedicated <b>all</b> of their <a href="http://www.europe-echecs.com/revue-du-mois.php">current issue</a> to Fischer. This is understandable, given that he never lived nor won any events in France.<br />
<br />
Maybe the USCF thinks it's being patriotic or making a stand against Fischer's anti-Judaism; I don't know. I myself am completely repulsed by Fischer's anti-American and anti-Jewish remarks, and I'm not inclined, as many are, to blame this on some sort of mental illness. All the same, to practically disregard one of the greatest players of all time, clearly the greatest American player of all time, and possibly the main reason why the USCF has any financial assets whatsoever, does not speak well on its behalf. Spend a few pages excoriating his vile comments and noting his character flaws and eccentricities - that's appropriate. But give his legacy the attention it deserves, not just a short article by Larry Evans and a few pages of quotations presented in a space-wasting format. Present a special, perhaps extra issue of the magazine dedicated to him. Rename an event for him. Have an invitational event for American players he competed with, like Evans, Pal Benko, Robert Byrne, Arthur Bisguier, et al. In short, pretend Fischer (really) mattered, both to the chess world at large and to the United States in particular...because he did.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1205304287.shtml/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trivia Time: What happened to A. Jocha?</title>
		<link>http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1205302197.shtml</link>
		<comments>http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1205302197.shtml#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 06:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Monokroussos</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Chess Mind]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:chessmind.powerblogs.com://799873581eca4f7d4f8d26f92e71ef56</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who? Yes, exactly. But he's a player those of us with a sense of history would have expected to hear about. He recently came (back) to my attention when looking through...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Who? Yes, exactly. But he's a player those of us with a sense of history would have expected to hear about. He recently came (back) to my attention when looking through some old books on Anatoly Karpov's early career. One of Karpov's big early successes came in the European Junior Championship in Groningen 1967-68. In the preliminary group he was satisfied merely to qualify for the final, which he did in a tie for second that included Jan Timman, Gert Ligterink and others, half a point behind our mystery man. Those scores did not carry over into the final, and when it counted it was Karpov who came in first. Timman was two points back and Ligterink three and a half point in arrears. Only half a point back, however, undefeated and in clear second, was Jocha.<br />
<br />
Yet this enigmatic figure soon disappears from the databases; quite surprising given his evident talent. Did he quit chess or, worse, meet an untimely end? The answer is googlable, unfortunately, but if any of you know the answer without looking it up, you're invited to post it in the comments, securing for yourself the admiration of your peers as a chess trivia expert par excellence. Should no one post the answer in the next day or two, I'll go ahead and spill the beans myself and say a bit more about this most interesting player.<br />
<br />
OK?]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1205302197.shtml/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Accessing my ChessBase Shows</title>
		<link>http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1114234449.shtml</link>
		<comments>http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1114234449.shtml#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 05:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Monokroussos</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Chess Mind]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:chessmind.powerblogs.com://ad921e2d32118e6b8769265ac24573f1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every Wednesday night, I present a live show on ChessBase's playchess.com server, and once the show is over it is uploaded into the server's archives. In this entry I'll...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every Wednesday night, I present a live show on <a href="http://chessbase.com/">ChessBase</a>'s <a href="http://playchess.com/">playchess.com</a> server, and once the show is over it is uploaded into the server's archives. In this entry I'll explain how to access both live and archived shows.</p>

<p><div>(<a href="#">show</a>)</div>
<div>
First Steps: Meeting your software needs</p>

<p>ChessBase Software
Unfortunately, it' s not as simple as opening your web browser and entering a URL, but it isn't too difficult. The first step is to get the right software, and there are two main options to choose from.</p>

<p>First, you can go to <a href="http://playchess.com/">playchess.com</a> and download the free client software. That will give you one month's free access to <a href="http://chessbase.com/">ChessBase</a>'s online server, which is where the show takes place.</p>

<p>A second option is to go shopping on the ChessBase website and purchase one of their playing programs (Fritz, Junior, Shredder, Hiarcs, Chess Tiger, etc.) for approximately 50 USD. The programs are all of appproximate world championship-level strength and have lots of neat bells &amp; whistles, but the relevant matter at hand is that you receive two free ("free" given the initial purchase of the software, of course) 1-year memberships to the playchess.com server.</p>

<p>Windows Media Player 9 (or later)
You'll also need Windows Media 9 or later (Microsoft is up to version 10 now). It probably came with your machine if it's a recent one, but if not, you can download it <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=b446ae53-3759-40cf-80d5-cde4bbe07999&amp;displaylang=en">here</a>.</p>

<p>Part Two: I have the software; now what?</p>

<p>If you have the standalone client (option 1, above), then life is simple: execute the program and log on. If you have Fritz or one of its counterparts, execute the program, choose the Playchess.com option and log on. From this point, the two options will work the same way.</p>

<p>The next step is to navigate inside the server. Once inside, your interface will probably consist of four windows. One of them, probably on the bottom right, will have a header that says "Rooms." In that window you'll see a directory structure listing the server's rooms, obviously enough; the one you'll want to watch the lives shows is "Broadcasts." Click once and you'll be in.</p>

<p>The next thing to do is to go to the window on the upper left. It should have four tabs on the top (Info, Players, Games and World) - select the players tab. That will list all the players in the room, including yourself. My account name is "Initiative", and the easiest way to watch me give the show is to double-click on my handle while the show is going on. (More generally, since there are other people who occasionally broadcast shows, click on the "Status" bar and then double-click on the account name of anyone listed as a "Chairman".) And that's all there is to it! A new window will automatically open displaying the analysis board and providing the show's audio.</p>

<p>Great, but what about all those wonderful shows I've missed?

Part 1: Buying Ducats
Almost every past show is in the archives, but first you'll have to buy what ChessBase calls "ducats" (that's what they call their online currency). While you're logged on with a registered account, go to the Edit menu, select Payments and from there Fill Up Your Account. Follow the directions on purchasing ducats and you'll be good to go within 24 hours or so, possibly sooner.</p>

<p>CB charges about $13 US for 100 ducats, so given their charge of 2 ducats (about 26 cents) to watch an archived show (sometimes 1 ducat, sometimes 4 ducats, if the show was broken into two parts), it's unlikely that anyone with an internet account and the ability to purchase chess software is going to feel much of a pinch here.</p>

<p>Part 2: Accessing the Old Shows
Now that you're the proud owner of a bucket of ducats, here's what you do. Log on to the playchess server, look in the Rooms window and click on Chess Media System, then from within there continue to telescope in as follows: Radio ChessBase--&gt;English--&gt;Great Games with Dennis Monokroussos.</p>

<p>Once you've done that, click on the Games tab in the upper left (sub-) window and you'll see the list of available shows. When you find one you like, double-click and start watching! After a few seconds, you'll be asked if you'd like to watch the rest of the broadcast for the prescribed fee. If you accept, then that's it - all that's left is to watch and enjoy!
<div>(<a href="#">hide</a>)</div></div></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1114234449.shtml/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This Week&#8217;s ChessBase Show: M. Gurevich-Zelcic, the 4.Qc2 Nimzo-Indian and the Two Bishops</title>
		<link>http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1205300910.shtml</link>
		<comments>http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1205300910.shtml#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 05:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Monokroussos</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Chess Mind]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:chessmind.powerblogs.com://b9a80b30842e7bab9a7cfaeba25d15a2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the most important openings in all of chess is the Nimzo-Indian Defense, and within this opening one of the most important approaches for White starts with 4.Qc2. Its fundamental...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[One of the most important openings in all of chess is the Nimzo-Indian Defense, and within this opening one of the most important approaches for White starts with 4.Qc2. Its fundamental idea is to grab the bishop pair with a quick a3, and to do so without incurring the doubled pawns that result from an immediate 4.a3 Bxc3+ 5.bxc3.<br />
<br />
Sounds good, you say, but what's the downside? The answer is as simple as the advice we all received as beginners: one should develop as quickly as possible, though generally not the queen. The 4.Qc2 Nimzo violates both halves of that precept, and therein we find Black's compensation. If he can use his speedier development to gain and maintain activity, he'll be fine; if not, White's bishop pair will gradually make its presence felt.<br />
<br />
In this week's show (tonight from 9-10 p.m. ET), we'll see the triumph of the bishop pair. The artist handling the White pieces is Mikhail Gurevich, one of those great players long on the cusp of the world's super-elite, nearly making the Candidates in 1991 and succeeding in 2007. Gurevich is a great expert on the 4.Qc2 Nimzo-Indian, and this 2004 game with Croatian GM Robert Zelcic, we see the two bishops recipe carried out almost to perfection. First, White finishes his development while staying out of trouble. Second, he gradually reduces Black's activity, turning things so that the only key difference is the imbalance of minor pieces. Once that occurs, the long-range bishops come into their own, and Black's position becomes increasingly passive. Finally, it's time to win the game, and with a minor hiccup or two along the way, that's just what happens.<br />
<br />
The foregoing narrative oversimplifies matters, of course. Zelcic had his chances, off and on, until quite near the end of the game. And it would be an error to think that gaining the bishop pair served as a sort of magic wand enabling its possessor to achieve his every whim on the chessboard. All the same, many games <i>have</i> been won by the skillful use of the bishop pair, that skillful use <i>does</i> often follow the broad pattern limned above, and this pattern <i>is</i> often seen in the 4.Qc2 Nimzo-Indian. So I think and hope many of you will not only find this game entertaining but instructive as well, something you can use in your own play. Tune in and see for yourself! (Directions <a href="http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1114234449.shtml">here</a>.)]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1205300910.shtml/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A New ChessVideo Show: A look at one of my Chicago games</title>
		<link>http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1205281228.shtml</link>
		<comments>http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1205281228.shtml#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Monokroussos</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Chess Mind]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:chessmind.powerblogs.com://59522d52eeae49791a86c1f073a3dc5c</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On ChessVideos.tv, I've been presenting USCL Games of the Year, but not for the next couple of weeks; instead, we'll have a look at a couple of my own games....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[On <a href="http://www.chessvideos.tv/">ChessVideos.tv</a>, I've been presenting USCL Games of the Year, but not for the next couple of weeks; instead, we'll have a look at a couple of my own games. This week we'll look back to one of my games from the 8th North American FIDE Invitational, played last month in Chicago, IL. The game is my fourth round win over young Indian IM Arjun Vishnuvardhan, a Sveshnikov Sicilian where I was able to exploit my opponent's inaccuracies in the opening to win in thematic fashion.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.chessvideos.tv/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&amp;t=2434&amp;sid=ac323a19839a63bea3c8d67f55d97b8f">Have a look</a> - the shows are free and can be accessed on-demand.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1205281228.shtml/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USCL Game of the Year #11: Molner-Kaufman</title>
		<link>http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1205280446.shtml</link>
		<comments>http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1205280446.shtml#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Monokroussos</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Chess Mind]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:chessmind.powerblogs.com://66410116c6bfc699540b7060d6b7b2ae</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US Chess League's countdown to the 2007 game of the year continues, with a new game eliminated each week on the way to #1. This week we're down to...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The <a href="http://www.uschessleague.com/">US Chess League</a>'s countdown to the 2007 game of the year continues, with a new game eliminated each week on the way to #1. This week we're down to #11, and the game chosen was Molner-Kaufman. It was a lively French Defense with big momentum swings: first White was winning, then Black had the advantage, and then White won. It wasn't perfect, but it was very entertaining.<br />
<br />
You can replay the game and see the judges' comments about it <a href="http://usclnews.blogspot.com/2008/03/game-of-year-11th-place.html">here</a>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1205280446.shtml/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Tactics Time Two-fer: Solve the puzzle, evaluate the analysis</title>
		<link>http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1205279238.shtml</link>
		<comments>http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1205279238.shtml#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Monokroussos</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Chess Mind]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:chessmind.powerblogs.com://399087a58a0b7abe58054176fc8e739f</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let's start with a nice combination, from the game Najer-Ftacnik, Bundesliga 2007/8:...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Let's start with a nice combination, from the game Najer-Ftacnik, Bundesliga 2007/8:<br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.chesscommunity.com/wp-content/uploads/chessmind.powerblogs.com/files/najer_ftacnik_bundesliga2008.jpg"><br />
<br />
It's White to move and win. (HT: <a href="http://www.chesstoday.net">Chess Today</a>)<br />
<br />
And now for something incompletely different. It's still a tactical problem of sorts, but this time instead of solving the position from scratch, your task is to evaluate a piece of analysis approved by Botvinnik and Soltis. Here's the position:<br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.chesscommunity.com/wp-content/uploads/chessmind.powerblogs.com/files/botvinnik_stoltz_1926_analysis.jpg"><br />
<br />
It's White to move, and in the game White played 12.Nxe4, not fearing the pawn fork. Had he been concerned and chosen <b>12.Bb1</b>, the claim is that Black would be in good shape - winning, actually - after <b>12...f5 13.Nxe4 fxe4 14.Rxc7 exf3 15.Rxb7 Qg5 16.g3 Qg4 17.Kh1 Rf6 18.Rg1 Rh6 19.Qf1 Qh5 20.h4 Qxh4</b>. Can we take this analysis to the bank, or would we be toting around counterfeit goods?<br />
<br />
Answers to both puzzles in a couple of days (meanwhile, please be kind to fellow solvers and avoid giving the solution in the comments).]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1205279238.shtml/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
